Latest posts by Kyle Sheldrake (see all)
- Platform or Publisher? The debate is older than you might think. - January 13, 2021
- ‘An artist who can get away with this’: The Press Response to Yves Klein’s 1957 London Exhibition - October 25, 2018
- Gale and Digital Humanities: A Potted History - October 3, 2018
- “There is no other remedy”: The Argument for Free Trade in the First Issue of The Economist - August 2, 2018
- ‘So complex and vital an organ’: 65 Years Since the First Successful Open Heart Surgery - September 6, 2017
Yves Klein calls his pictures “Propositions.” He very carefully roughens the surfaces so as to express his sensibility. Then he invites the spectator to share the artist’s sensibility by “allowing the mind to plunge into the heart of the colour.”
The debate around modern art versus representational art had begun by the 1950s. The pages of The Listener had followed the debates, as a subject that had “often led to controversy”. Modern art was perceived as an area where “execution determines design instead of design determining execution”, and the modern artist “has done away with the rational meaning of the subject-matter required in traditional art and allows unconscious phantasy to express itself more clearly”. Klein, as the emerging face of modern art, represented this, arguing “that our primary ocular sensation is that of colour, and that he, as an artist, wishes to free this sensation of colour from all extraneous or limiting circumstances.”
By the late 1950s, Yves Klein (1928-1962) had established himself as one of the most prominent of the post-war ‘anti-art’ avant-garde artists, having developed a philosophy based around the freedom and excitement of art that had been introduced by Marcel Duchamp (1887-1968). By 1957, he had begun his ‘blue period’, creating monochrome canvases and sculptures in International Klein Blue, a colour he had developed himself.
In the summer of 1957, Klein exhibited in London, and it is fair to say there was a noticeable level of […] in the reception he got from the press. There was enough interest and fanfare around his work that the national dailies felt they had to cover it, and it seems like many reviewers did not know what to make of his ‘monotone propositions’: whilst they were not overtly hostile, they did not see eye to eye with Klein on his approach or his philosophy.
The headline of the Daily Mail’s piece set the tone: ‘Art-with-a-roller is here’, not holding back on the implication of a lack of skill and technique. The implication he was more of a decorator than an artist was given away by his use of a “builder’s paint roller”, with little consideration of any of the nuances in technique in creating these works. The [incredulous?] undertone of the review was most clearly suggested by the Daily Mail’s focus on the price of the works, subtly suggesting they were rather expensive for something that did not take much skill or craft.
The Times did have more appreciation for the nuance (as seen by the opening quotation), but their objection was not he prices of the works, but the elevation of theory over practice. Klein’s works served as the purest articulation of the emerging artistic approach that we now associate with modern art: one that is overly driven by ideas and artistic philosophies, and these philosophies being used as a cover for the absence of skill and craftsmanship. The subhead, ‘reductio ad absurdum’ tells us where the article is going from the outset, and the reviewer is not afraid to point out that “M. Klein’s paintings have no interest beyond their theoretical implications…but this extreme position was bound to be demonstrated by someone, sometime. Now it has been done, and we can return to the happy impurities of a less hypothetical art”. Punch were typically succinct with heir backhanded compliment that summed up the general reaction toward Klein’s monochrome works, stating that “even British painters are said to be loud in their admiration for an artist who can get away with this”.
Almost exactly five years after the London exhibition, Yves Klein died at the age of 34 from multiple heart attacks whilst attending the premiere of a film he had starred in. Klein’s work was still divisive, and the report of his death in the International Herald Tribune summed him up as an artist “whom some critics considered a seeker of the absolute and other execrated as an imposter”, having “acquired a reputation as one of the most violent and demonstrative of Parisian avant-garde painters”.
 Ehrenzweig, Anton, and Third Programme. “The Modern Artist and the Creative Accident.” The Listener, 12 Jan. 1956, p. 53+. The Listener Historical Archive, 1929-1991, tinyurl.galegroup.com/tinyurl/59RK4
 Adapted from: Spencer, Charles. “Yves Klein.” Encyclopaedia Judaica, edited by Michael Berenbaum and Fred Skolnik, 2nd ed., Macmillan Reference USA, 2007
 “Yves Klein, 34, Controversial Artist, Dies.” New York Herald Tribune [European Edition], June 9-10, 1962, p. 2. International Herald Tribune Historical Archive 1887-2013, tinyurl.galegroup.com/tinyurl/59RGh7